Comments for Philadelphia Church of God

Comment on Why do white people love Obama who hates the white race? by Federal Farmer

Federal Farmer — Mon, 12 Oct 2009 18:13:18 +0000

Does Obama being multiracial make any difference here? I just blogged on it at http://soozah.wordpress.com/2009/10/12/rush-limbough-on-the-banking-queen-and-the-magic-negro/

Comment on White Israelites undermined by liberal Jews by martyfink

martyfink — Mon, 14 Sep 2009 19:50:43 +0000

The Catholics lied to get what they wanted, but underneath they would do anything to advance global feudal peasant fascism as the perfect medieval past, which is why they still try to canonize their nazi pope at every turn, still yearn to abide by Pio Nino’s stricture against democracy, and unite with muslims and confucians.

Comment on Gerald Flurry can’t handle criticism! by a reader

a reader — Tue, 09 Jun 2009 05:17:05 +0000

Hi:

Check out the wikipedia article on “Gerald Flurry”.

Comment on The Battle for Britain’s Masculinity by Paul W. Davis

Paul W. Davis — Thu, 19 Feb 2009 05:08:39 +0000

I don’t agree with your doctrine.

However, this is a post that is sorely needed. You are correct – the LORD is not blessing Great Britain. As an avid reader of history and one who enjoys reading about Africa, these particular battles of Britain against the Zulus are the stuff of legend. The bravery of the British troops at Isandlwana and Rorke’s Drift is to be emulated. Not that one wishes to die, but cowardice is not an option.

Sadly, America is not far behind Britain.

Comment on Obama is a terrorist act against US by Ted

Ted — Mon, 02 Feb 2009 17:11:06 +0000

The Joint Chiefs of Staff HAVE AN ABSOLUTE CONSTITUTIONAL DUTY to stand behind Guantanamo Military Judge James Pohl UNTIL OBAMA OVERCOMES “RES IPSA LOQUITUR” BY SUPPLYING HIS LONG FORM BIRTH CERTIFICATE AND PROVING HIS ELIGIBILITY TO BE PRESIDENT UNDER ARTICLE 2 OF THE US CONSTITUTION.

Comment on Obama’s Coup by Ted

Ted — Thu, 29 Jan 2009 22:17:48 +0000

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/01/29/AR2009012902021.html?wprss=rss_nation

Comment on Obama’s Coup by Ted

Ted — Thu, 29 Jan 2009 20:05:04 +0000

OK, OK, OK, enough already, I can’t take any more hoaxes: First we have Al Gore’s global warming, next comes Obama being a constitutionally qualified President, followed by Obama’s stimulus plan, but now we have Robert Reich telling us why we need stronger unions. Are we heading for Saturday Night Live 24/7?

Comment on Obama’s Coup by Ted

Ted — Thu, 29 Jan 2009 12:46:03 +0000

Obama says his “recovery plan will include UNPRECEDENTED measures that will allow the American people to hold [his] administration ACCOUNTABLE” yet Obama refuses to be held ACCOUNTABLE to the same American people for his UNPRECEDENTED refusal to show his actual birth certificate.

Comment on Is Obama guilty? by Ted

Ted — Sun, 18 Jan 2009 21:59:09 +0000

The question is not IF there will be an interdiction of Obama’s Presidency by the Supreme Court, the questions are WHEN and HOW that interdiction will transpire — that is, if the USA is to continue as the Constitutional Republic that now exists.

Comment on Zionists, globalists, Catholics, Christians? by Timothy

Timothy — Sat, 17 Jan 2009 04:18:11 +0000

>”Those “generally stupid and unlearned” folk were Roman Catholics”

Other than personal hatred, I’d be curious as to what actual proof you have to back up your claim.

>”Bible-believing Christians want to be falsely associated with hateful Roman Catholicism, which we know and understand and expose is nothing but the Babylonian Mystery religion in “Christian” drag, misleading the masses.”

There’s a contradictory sentence if I ever read one. If one considers Catholicism to be Babylonian Mystery religion, then one neither knows nor understands Catholicism, thus the contradiction.

God bless… +Timothy